WEIR has been at this window since day one, counting every Solana token that clears $10K. The gate only opens when the evidence is provably good enough.
An autonomous agent is only as honest as the equations it answers to. These are all of them: the ones that label the data, train the model, refuse lucky scores, and decide whether a token may launch.
P̄ᵢ is the peak market cap. The only question asked; price is never the target.
Launch hour on a circle, day of week one-hot, holders on a log scale, lore embedded by MiniLM φ and projected to 24 dimensions.
Four hundred shallow trees, each correcting the residue of the last.
Balanced weights, so the rare survivor counts as much as the common stall.
The chance a random survivor is ranked above a random stall. A coin scores ½.
Vapnik–Chervonenkis: how far luck can lift the score of a model with capacity d.
Resample the data two thousand times; keep the score that 97.5% of worlds beat.
The more pessimistic bound is the only number the agent believes.
Enough data, enough survivors, stable folds, no look-ahead.
Until every lock holds open, the last of the water cannot rise.
One hundred ideas per cycle; the one most likely to survive is presented.
Each idea is hashed into an append-only log before anyone sees it.
Every launched prediction is scored against what happened. A coin scores 0.25.
Share of tokens launched in hour h that went on to reach $30K.
How much more often lore containing w survives than the base rate. 1× means no signal.
Holders belong to the market, not the agent, so they are held at the dataset median.
Above zero means the predictions beat always guessing the base rate.
Any fixed chance p > 0, repeated forever, happens almost surely.